• Blog
  • Info Support
  • Career
  • Training
  • International Group
  • Info Support
  • Blog
  • Career
  • Training
  • International Group
  • Search
logo InfoSupport
  • Latest blogs
  • Popular blogs
  • Experts
      • Alles
      • Bloggers
      • Speakers
  • Meet us
  • About us
    • nl
    • en
    • .NET
    • Advanced Analytics
    • Agile
    • Akka
    • Alexa
    • Algorithms
    • Api's
    • Architectuur
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • ATDD
    • Augmented Reality
    • AWS
    • Azure
    • Big Data
    • Blockchain
    • Business Intelligence
    • Cloud
    • Code Combat
    • Cognitive Services
    • Communicatie
    • Containers
    • Continuous Delivery
    • CQRS
    • Cyber Security
    • Dapr
    • Data
    • Data & Analystics
    • Data Science
    • Data Warehousing
    • Databricks
    • DevOps
    • Digital Days
    • Docker
    • eHealth
    • Enterprise Architecture
    • Hacking
    • Infrastructure & Hosting
    • Innovatie
    • Integration
    • Internet of Things
    • Java
    • Machine Learning
    • Microservices
    • Microsoft
    • Microsoft Bot Framework
    • Microsoft Data Platform
    • Mobile Development
    • Mutation Testing
    • Open source
    • Pepper
    • Power BI
    • Privacy & Ethiek
    • Python
    • Quality Assistance & Test
    • Quality Assurance & Test
    • Requirements Management
    • Scala
    • Scratch
    • Security
    • SharePoint
    • Software Architecture
    • Software development
    • Software Factory
    • SQL Server
    • SSL
    • Start-up
    • Startup thinking
    • Stryker
    • Test Quality
    • Testing
    • TLS
    • TypeScript
    • Various
    • Web Development
    • Web-scale IT
    • Xamarin
    • Alles
    • Bloggers
    • Speakers
Home » "We are all idiots"
  • "We are all idiots"

    • By Peter Hendriks
    • Various 14 years ago
    • Various 0 comments
    • Various Various
    "We are all idiots"

    I just finished reading The Dilbert Principle for what must be the fourth time. I just love that book. Dilbert must be the most popular comic about the "office space" industry. The dorky Dilbert has bizarre adventures in too small cubicles, doing meaningless work for a clueless PHB with insane people and talking animals around him. Ironically, the reason so many people like the comic is that it they recognize much of the ordeals Dilbert goes through. This quote by Guy Kawasaki pretty much sums it up:
    "There are only two kinds of companies," he says. "Those that recognize they're just like 'Dilbert,' and those that are also like 'Dilbert' but don't know it yet."

    The real-world truths inside the comics and books are seen by many as valuable and accurate. In fact, even some business management education programs like this Berkeley one consider "The Dilbert Principle" recommended reading in their program.

    So why does Dilbert look that much like the real world? Well, for starters, the author, Scott Adams, based a lot of the comics on real life stories submitted by readers and his own experience as an engineer. But, in the book he also starts with an interesting thesis on why his ridiculous comics are such a close match with reality: "we are all idiots!".

    The thesis may seem like just another cynical joke, but Adams actually does give a fairly convincing argument on why "we are all idiots" in his book. Summarized in my own words:

    People do not have a constant intelligence: the cognitive capability of the brain is not the same all the time. Even exceptionally bright people can think up a stupid idea in an unguarded moment. Being considered smart is not a safeguard for not being an idiot at times. And being considered dumb does not mean you'll never have a good idea. The brain may need a good night of sleep, a clear mental state, a certain level of alcohol, or it is just chemical chance. Truth is, we are still too stupid to really understand why and when we get to think up smart things.

    People deal with ideas they do not fully understand: back in the good old days, people wore bear skins, slept in a cave, and threw pointy shaped rocks on a stick at animals to get food. Once communication technology advanced, technology and concepts spread based on ideas by a tiny few exceptionally smart people (who spent a lot of time thinking about them). The rest of the population only barely understands enough to cope with the results, but cannot reason or act rationally on these advanced ideas. The process of natural evolution got short-circuited. Evolutionary, we are not much past the Neanderthal stage. Technologically, we are in over our head.

    People are not governed by logic: in our personal life, we tend to accept emotional and impulsive behavior as something normal. In the professional world, people tend to expect that all activities are based on a logical structure. When you think about it, most activities precede very little to none rational activity (when was the last time when you rationally evaluated what to do next today?). However, to meet the expectation most actions are often rationalized after the fact. This leads to weird explanations that cause sensible actions to look stupid, or may trigger some idiot reaction based on the rationalized fallacy.

    So can we turn this harsh conclusion on the limited human capabilities into a positive note? Well, for one, most current processes that deal with people consider humans some constant, interchangeable cog, void of any emotions, impulses or fluctuations in capability. If we could tune our process to better accommodate our human flaws they would be much more effective!

    Pair programming for instance transforms evaluation and feedback into a social, ongoing activity. From a purely logical point of view, pair programming would not be very efficient. If you consider both humans in the pair potential idiots, evolved from bearskin wearing rockslinging cavedwellers, it makes a lot more sense.

    Using physical representation in an interactive priorities setting process, logically, is worse then a list in a spread sheet. However, consider that a row of cards on a table allow a better usage of human sensory capabilities (you can grab a card, spatial information, colors, shape, etc). It frees our brain from fiddling with a mouse, looking at tiny menus and wading through crazy Excel menus.

    I guess the bottom line is: do something smart with the fact that we are all idiots. 🙂

    Share this

Peter Hendriks

View profile

IT Training at Info Support

Which training fits you?

Consultancy

Consultancy

Related blogs

  • Video Conferencing en OBS Studio koppelen: online prese…

    Video Conferencing en OBS Studio koppelen: online prese… Maaike Brouwer - 1 year ago

  • Verantwoordelijkheid pakken in jouw eigen persoonlijke …

    Verantwoordelijkheid pakken in jouw eigen persoonlijke … Stephan Versteegh - 1 year ago

  • Tips voor als je gaat afstuderen

    Tips voor als je gaat afstuderen Bart Renders - 2 years ago

Related downloads

  • Beslisboom voor een rechtmatig ‘kopietje productie’

  • Klantreferentie: Remmicom zet wetgeving om in intellige…

  • Klantreferentie RDW: Samenwerken voor veilig en vertrou…

  • Klantreferentie BeFrank: Strategische IT voor een innov…

  • Wie durft te experimenteren met data in de zorg?

Related videos

  • mijnverzekeringenopeenrij.nl

    mijnverzekeringenopeenrij.nl

  • Winnaar | Innovation Projects 2017

    Winnaar | Innovation Projects 2017

  • Explore | Info Support & HAN & Poliskluis

    Explore | Info Support & HAN & Poliskluis

  • LifeApps bij HagaZiekenhuis

    LifeApps bij HagaZiekenhuis

  • Info Support | Bedrijfsfilm

    Info Support | Bedrijfsfilm

Nieuwsbrief

* verplichte velden

Contact

  • Head office NL
  • Kruisboog 42
  • 3905 TG Veenendaal
  • T +31 318 552020
  • Call
  • Mail
  • Directions
  • Head office BE
  • Generaal De Wittelaan 17
  • bus 30 2800 Mechelen
  • T +32 15 286370
  • Call
  • Mail
  • Directions

Follow us

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube

Newsletter

Sign in

Extra

  • Media Library
  • Disclaimer
  • Algemene voorwaarden
  • ISHBS Webmail
  • Extranet
Beheer cookie toestemming
Deze website maakt gebruik van Functionele en Analytische cookies voor website optimalisatie en statistieken.
Functioneel
Altijd actief
De technische opslag of toegang is strikt noodzakelijk voor het legitieme doel het gebruik mogelijk te maken van een specifieke dienst waarom de abonnee of gebruiker uitdrukkelijk heeft gevraagd, of met als enig doel de uitvoering van de transmissie van een communicatie over een elektronisch communicatienetwerk.
Voorkeuren
De technische opslag of toegang is noodzakelijk voor het legitieme doel voorkeuren op te slaan die niet door de abonnee of gebruiker zijn aangevraagd.
Statistieken
De technische opslag of toegang die uitsluitend voor statistische doeleinden wordt gebruikt. De technische opslag of toegang die uitsluitend wordt gebruikt voor anonieme statistische doeleinden. Zonder dagvaarding, vrijwillige naleving door uw Internet Service Provider, of aanvullende gegevens van een derde partij, kan informatie die alleen voor dit doel wordt opgeslagen of opgehaald gewoonlijk niet worden gebruikt om je te identificeren.
Marketing
De technische opslag of toegang is nodig om gebruikersprofielen op te stellen voor het verzenden van reclame, of om de gebruiker op een website of over verschillende websites te volgen voor soortgelijke marketingdoeleinden.
Beheer opties Beheer diensten Beheer leveranciers Lees meer over deze doeleinden
Voorkeuren
{title} {title} {title}